Complex visit coding, TCM after discharge, and high-acuity CCM are all under-billed in independent IM practices. We rank each gap by estimated dollars, with sources and assumptions shown.
Every report compares your numbers against published peer data. Sources include MGMA, CMS, and specialty-society reports.
| Metric | Reference value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 99214 share, IM benchmark | 55–68% of established visits | MGMA |
| TCM billing rate post-discharge | <35% of eligible discharges | CMS analysis |
| Medicare share, IM median | 48% | MGMA 2024 |
You don't need all four. Start with the one we recommend first — most owners stop there because it surfaces enough to act on for the next 90 days.
Specialty-specific coding checklist with commonly missed codes, modifier traps, and a 30-day fix list.
Sizes your CCM, RPM, AWV, and TCM billing opportunity based on your patient panel.
Ranks your top 8–10 revenue expansion opportunities by specialty, staff, and payer mix.
Benchmarks your payer mix against peers and flags the contracts most worth renegotiating.
Pulled from patterns we see across audits. Your numbers will differ, but the categories are remarkably consistent.
Both. We flag patterns where you're likely leaving revenue on the table AND patterns where modifier or coding usage carries audit exposure.