Audit module · included in the full clinic audit

Referral leakage

Quantifies revenue lost by referring out procedures you could perform in-house.

What you'll get

  • Estimated $/year leaked to outbound referrals, broken down by procedure category

    Assumes: Calculated from your reported referral volume × specialty-average reimbursement; aggregated to the category level (not individual CPT) to stay directional.

  • Top 5 procedures you could bring in-house, ranked by 12-month net contribution

    Assumes: Net contribution = projected revenue − staff cost − equipment depreciation − supplies; ranked only among procedures that fit your scope and space.

  • Capital + staffing + space + credentialing requirements per procedure (with dollar ranges)

    Assumes: Equipment quoted as category price ranges, not vendor SKUs; credentialing timelines use national averages, not your specific board.

  • 12-month ramp model with break-even month and an explicit downside scenario

    Assumes: Base case assumes 70% of national volume benchmark by month 12; downside assumes 45%. No upside-only projections.

  • Suggested CPT bundle + credentialing checklist per bring-in-house recommendation

    Assumes: CPT bundles cite AMA descriptors; credentialing list is generic across major commercial payers — not customized per contract.

Sample output

You're referring out ~$186K/year in procedures. Bringing 2 of them in-house pays back equipment + training in 7 months.

Who this is for

  • Specialty or primary care practices referring out 10+ procedures/month
  • Owners considering hiring an additional provider type (NP, PA, sub-specialist)
  • Clinics with procedure room capacity that sits unused

Not the right fit if

  • Solo providers with no plan to add staff or procedure capacity
  • Practices that refer out fewer than 5 procedures per month

How we build it

  1. 1We model your outbound referral mix against specialty norms to estimate volume and reimbursement of each leaked procedure.
  2. 2Bring-in-house feasibility uses your existing staff scope, room availability, and capital constraints — not a generic best-case.
  3. 3Every recommendation includes a downside case so you're not buying into a hockey stick.

What we'll ask in intake

  • Top procedures you currently refer out and approximate monthly volume
  • Existing equipment and procedure rooms
  • Provider scope (MDs, NPs, PAs, sub-specialty training)
  • Capital appetite for the next 12 months

No PHI required. Aggregates, percentages, and estimates are enough.

Frequently asked questions

7 questions

Didn't answer your question? Email us — we reply within 4 business hours.

Want this done with you?

Service Line Launch — from $7,500

Once you've picked a procedure to bring in-house, we run sourcing, training pairing, and CPT setup so you're operational — not theoretical.

This is a separate, defined engagement; scope and fee are confirmed before work begins.

Related reports